
World Trade Organisation
Agenda: Globalisation and Protectionism
(Double Delegate Committee)
Freeze date: December 2026
​​
In a world previously characterized by the promise of free markets and interconnected economies, the return of protectionist policies is redefining the global economic landscape. Between 2025 and December 2026, the global trade system has been challenged by a surge of aggressive tariffs, the weakening of multilateral mechanisms, and an expanding gap between the Global North and South. While traditional “superpowers” such as the United States and the European Union impose high and aggressive tariffs, under the pretext of "smart protectionism," developing nations are experiencing unprecedented economic setbacks. American tariffs now include a 10% blanket tax on all imports and a debilitating 145% tariff on Chinese imports, while the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) imposes draconian levies on carbon-dense imports, disproportionately targeting energy and manufacturing dependent Southern economies.
Agricultural exporters like Thailand and Kenya have seen their markets shrink; India’s GDP projections have been downgraded due to rising trade tensions; and Bangladesh’s textile sector, once a cornerstone of employment and growth, has collapsed under environmental tariffs. Furthermore, currency devaluations, stock market crashes, and food crises have followed - creating tensions that stem beyond the realms of trade. These waves of protectionism are not isolated policy choices, but part of a broader trend where the West retreats into economic nationalism at the expense of the Global South.
Amidst the chaos, the Doha Development Round, launched in 2001 with the aim of rebalancing trade in favor of developing countries - has been pronounced "dormant," evoking sharp criticism from Southern leaders who see this as the symbolic demise of fair globalization, and the West’s attempt at “economic warfare.”
Moreover, the WTO's Appellate Body is still dysfunctional, depriving developing countries of legal remedy to contest unfair policies. However, this has not stopped the global South from speaking out; civil society demonstrations in Dhaka, Accra, and Bogotá, Nairobi-Dhaka joint memorandums, and covert retaliatory coordination between Indonesia and South Africa have all registered a change in the political will of developing countries. In September 2026, India, Brazil, and Vietnam made a threat at the WTO General Council: reopen the Doha Round, reinstate the dispute settlement system, and give developing countries special treatment under the law - or face their departure. And it was when the Western countries responded indifferently, did the Global South make a bold move. In December 2026, 25 nations initiated the “Global South Retaliation Pact” in Recife, Brazil. They declared that this new multilateral coalition will fight back against Western trade imperialism with synchronized tariffs and construct an alternative South-South trade regime with its own tribunal and pro-development architecture.
Delegates will have to consider whether the existing trade frameworks can be overhauled to bring justice to developing nations, or whether a new economic order must be envisioned. Can the Doha Round be resuscitated, or is the time finally here for a fresh start? At this explosive and profoundly divided moment, the future of world trade, and of multilateralism itself, hangs in the balance.
Letter from the Director
Dear Delegates,
It is my honour and privilege to welcome you to the World Trade Organization at the 29th session of the Cathedral Model United Nations
.
This year’s committee tackles a defining issue of our time: the shifting balance between globalisation and protectionism. Globalisation has long been credited with accelerating development and innovation. But today, that system is under pressure. From escalating trade wars to supply chain disruptions, countries are re-evaluating their dependence on international markets. Protectionist measures, framed as efforts to protect local economies, are re-emerging across the globe, often at the expense of developing nations and international cooperation.
​
This committee meets at a moment when trade is no longer just about economics, but rather about power, politics, and the future of multilateralism. As delegates, you’ll debate the consequences of rising tariffs, the legitimacy of carbon border adjustments, the WTO’s relevance, and the path toward a more balanced and inclusive global trade architecture. The goal isn’t to choose between open markets or isolation, but to understand how systems can evolve to meet the needs of all.
​
This committee is something I’m genuinely excited about, not only because of what it stands for, but also because of the kind of debate I know it’ll bring. That’s why I’m so glad to be directing it this year. I’m Vir Gogia, and CMUN has been a huge part of my journey.
​
If there’s one thing I’ve learned over the years, it’s that CMUN isn’t just a conference, but where I found my voice. It’s the space that shaped how I think, how I speak, and how I lead. Some of my favourite memories were made here, and now, I get to return, for the fifth and final time, as your Director. However, this isn’t just the end of a cycle for me. It’s the culmination of where it all began. And as I step into this role, I hope it becomes the same for many of you—a space where you grow, challenge yourself, and maybe even find your voice.
​
Outside committee, I tend to carry the same energy into everything I do (usually too many things at once). You’ll often find me bouncing between environmental science projects, horror films I refuse to stop rewatching, oddly specific debates about rom-com tropes, and casually ranking Disney soundtracks during lunch. I’ve also been known to start a conversation about trade policy and somehow end it on golf scores (The 2025 Masters were wild).
What I bring to committee is seriousness where it’s needed, a sense of humour where it’s welcome, and a genuine investment in making sure everyone in the room has the space to contribute, grow, and enjoy the process. More than an intimidating committee, I believe in a committee that’s well-run. So expect strong debate, constant engagement, and maybe the occasional TED Talk from me if we start discussing Final Destination’s economic symbolism (you’ve been warned).
​
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our Executive Board at Wto.cmun2025@gmail.com
​
Until August,
Vir Gogia
Director, World Trade Organization
Cathedral Model United Nations, 2025.

Vir Gogia
Director